5 common mistakes in piping design and how to avoid them
Designing industrial piping systems is a high-responsibility task that requires advanced knowledge of mechanical engineering, international standards, structural analysis, and critical operating conditions. A mistake at this stage can lead to catastrophic failures, costly project delays, or even legal consequences. In this article, we analyze the five most frequent piping design errors and offer clear recommendations to avoid them from the conceptual engineering phase.
Inadequate material selection
One of the most critical mistakes is choosing materials that are not suitable for the service conditions. Key factors to consider include:
- Maximum and minimum operating temperaturas.
- Internal and external pressures.
- Nature of the fluid (corrosive, toxic, flammable).
- Galvanic compatibility.
- Applicable standards (ASME, ASTM, ISO).
For instance, selecting carbon steel for an acid transport line can lead to rapid corrosion. The solution? Apply rigorous selection criteria and rely on trusted references such as ASME Section II Part D.
Underestimating loads and stresses
Designers often overlook all the loads a piping system might be subjected to, including:
- Dead weight (pipe + fluid).
- Internal/external pressure.
- Wind or seismic forces.
- Dynamic loads from pumps and valves.
- Reactions at supports and anchors.
Neglecting these can lead to vibration, structural fatigue, or unexpected stress fractures. Mitigation involves conducting a finite element analysis and simulating load conditions using tools like CAESAR II or AutoPIPE.
Ignoring thermal expansion
Pipes expand and contract with temperature changes. Failing to account for thermal expansion can result in excessive stress. This is especially common in long runs without expansion joints.
To avoid this:
- Calculate expected thermal expansión.
- Incorporate loops, expansion joints, or sliding supports.
- Use simulation software to verify movement.
Factoring this into your design is essential to maintain system integrity.
Misapplying or ignoring applicable codes
Designing without referencing codes such as ASME B31.3, B31.1, or EN 13480 is unacceptable. These codes define:
- Minimum wall thickness.
- Welding procedures.
- Pressure and leak testing.
- Service classification.
Using the wrong code (e.g., B31.1 instead of B31.3) can render the design invalid during regulatory audits. Ongoing education is key to avoiding this pitfall.
Lack of maintenance and operability criteria
Piping design must go beyond installation. It should also include:
- Access for inspection and maintenance.
- Space for component disassembly.
- Proper location of isolation and drain valves.
- Safe access routes for operators.
Overlooking these aspects can hinder future operations or lead to costly downtime.
From theory to practice: How technical training reduces engineering failures
Specialized training allows you to anticipate technical challenges before they become costly or safety-related deviations. A master’s program structured around real-world case studies and international standards can help you consolidate the critical knowledge needed to make better decisions in your projects.
Explore the full program content of the Master of Piping Systems Engineering and discover how it can help you prevent critical design errors from the outset.
Other articles you may find useful:
WhatsApp